unfreeze_baseling

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states the action but does not mention side effects (e.g., resource cost, cooldowns), required permissions, or whether it can fail. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at 4 words, no filler. Front-loads the action. However, slight under-specification prevents a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter, the description is adequate but could mention that 'cryo' refers to frozen state or that the tool requires no other inputs. Absence of output schema is acceptable as return values are likely straightforward.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter is well-described in the schema ('Baseling token ID'). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already carries the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Wake') and resource ('baseling from cryo'), clearly indicating the action of reactivating a frozen baseling. Distinguishes from sibling 'freeze_baseling' and 'resurrect_baseling' by implying reverse of freeze. However, 'cryo' is informal and not fully defined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'freeze_baseling' or 'resurrect_baseling'. Implied context is only that it reverses a freeze, but lacks when-not or prerequisite conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.