unassign_worker
Remove a baseling from its assigned job using its token ID. Frees the worker for reassignment.
Instructions
Remove a baseling from their job
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| baselingId | Yes | Baseling token ID to unassign |
Remove a baseling from its assigned job using its token ID. Frees the worker for reassignment.
Remove a baseling from their job
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| baselingId | Yes | Baseling token ID to unassign |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must stand alone. It only says 'remove', implying a destructive action, but does not disclose reversibility, permissions, or consequences.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence without fluff. However, it may be too brief for a tool with no annotations or output schema.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimal. It does not explain the result of unassignment or the state change, leaving gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'baselingId' described as 'Baseling token ID to unassign'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (remove) and the resource (baseling from their job). It distinguishes from sibling tools like assign_worker, but could be more specific about what 'job' means.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like freeze_baseling or assign_worker. The description does not mention prerequisites, side effects, or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jimbo530/baselings-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server