Create Plain Site

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions returning an operation_id, hinting at async behavior, but does not elaborate on side effects. Annotations include openWorldHint=true, and the description adds limited behavioral context beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short, efficient sentences with no extraneous information. It is front-loaded and every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (indicated) and good schema coverage, the description explains the return value. However, it lacks details about prerequisites, async nature, and the meaning of operation_id.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description adds context about creating an empty site but does not enhance understanding of individual parameters like valid regions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new plain (empty) site without WordPress, using specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like kinsta.sites.create which presumably creates WordPress sites.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for empty sites but does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternatives like kinsta.sites.create for WordPress sites. No explicit guidance on prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.