Create Backup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The 'openWorldHint' annotation indicates potential side effects, and the description adds that it returns an operation_id, which is useful. However, it does not disclose whether the operation is synchronous or asynchronous, or any other behavioral traits like cost or duration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two sentences, front-loading the purpose and key output. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the presence of output schema and full param coverage, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context about backup duration, asynchronicity, or prerequisites like environment state.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents both parameters. The description adds no further meaning beyond what the schema provides (e.g., tag description is repeated). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a manual backup for an environment and returns an operation_id. The verb 'Create' and resource 'backup' are explicit, and it is distinct from sibling tools like delete, list, or restore.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for manual backups but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use it vs. alternatives (e.g., scheduled backups) or when not to use it. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.