Get Bandwidth Usage Analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint. The description adds 'billable bandwidth', indicating a focus on cost-relevant data, which is useful but not extensive. No additional behavioral traits (e.g., data recency, limits) are disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and simple parameters, the description is adequate but minimal. It does not clarify differences from sibling analytics tools or provide any usage context beyond the core action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters have descriptions in the schema (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema; 'for an environment' maps to env_id, but no further detail on timeframe or usage of parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get bandwidth usage analytics') and resource ('environment') with the qualifier 'billable bandwidth'. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like 'kinsta.analytics.bandwidth' or 'kinsta.analytics.cdn-bandwidth-usage', limiting its distinctiveness.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'kinsta.analytics.bandwidth' or 'kinsta.analytics.cdn-bandwidth-usage'. The description lacks any context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.