Update Redirects

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, so the description's mention of 'create, update, or delete' aligns but adds no additional context. No disclosure of irreversible actions, permission requirements, or effects on other resources. With annotations present, the description should still add value but does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded. It avoids verbosity, but could benefit from structured formatting like bullet points or examples to improve scannability. Still, it earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite high complexity (10 params, nested objects, enums, output schema), the description provides no context on parameter relationships, pagination, or output. The agent is left to rely solely on the schema and annotations, which are insufficient for an informed selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not elaborate on parameter meaning beyond what the schema provides. The schema already describes enums and required fields, leaving little room for added value from the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Create, update, or delete redirect rules for an environment.' It uses specific verbs and identifies the resource (redirect rules) and scope (environment). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'kinsta.environments.redirects' which likely reads redirects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or comparison with siblings. The agent must infer usage context from the tool name and parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.