Skip to main content
Glama

notebook_query_start

Start an asynchronous query for large notebooks to avoid timeouts. Get a query ID to poll for results.

Instructions

Start a notebook query asynchronously for large notebooks that may timeout.

Use this instead of notebook_query when querying notebooks with many sources (50+) where the response may take longer than 60 seconds. Returns immediately with a query_id. Poll notebook_query_status with the query_id to get the result.

Workflow: notebook_query_start -> poll notebook_query_status until completed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
notebook_idYesNotebook UUID
queryYesQuestion to ask
source_idsNoSource IDs to query (default: all)
conversation_idNoFor follow-up questions
timeoutNoRequest timeout in seconds (default: from env NOTEBOOKLM_QUERY_TIMEOUT or 120.0)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses async behavior, immediate return with query_id, and need to poll notebook_query_status. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden; could mention error handling or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, front-loaded with purpose, then usage guidance, then workflow. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, workflow, and differentiation. With output schema present, return details are covered there. Could mention failure scenarios but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds context about when to use the tool but not additional parameter details beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it starts an async notebook query for large notebooks that may timeout, differentiating itself from the synchronous notebook_query tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use this instead of notebook_query when querying notebooks with many sources (50+) where the response may take longer than 60 seconds' and describes the workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jacob-bd/notebooklm-mcp-cli'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server