Skip to main content
Glama
idoyudha

mcp-keycloak

by idoyudha

update_user

Update an existing user's details including username, email, and enabled status in Keycloak.

Instructions

Update an existing user.

Args:
    user_id: The user's ID
    username: New username
    email: New email address
    first_name: New first name
    last_name: New last name
    enabled: Whether the user is enabled
    email_verified: Whether the email is verified
    attributes: Updated user attributes
    realm: Target realm (uses default if not specified)

Returns:
    Status message

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
user_idYes
usernameNo
emailNo
first_nameNo
last_nameNo
enabledNo
email_verifiedNo
attributesNo
realmNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description lacks details on behavioral traits such as idempotency, error handling (e.g., user not found), or required permissions. The 'Status message' return is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear parameter list and return statement. It could be improved by front-loading the purpose more prominently, but it's efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters and many sibling tools, the description lacks context on side effects, required permissions, error conditions, and return value details (output schema exists but not elaborated). Incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description's parameter explanations add value. However, they are minimal (e.g., 'Updated user attributes' is vague). Compensates partially but not fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update an existing user', specifying the action and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like create_user, delete_user, and get_user by its verb and focus on modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives, prerequisites (e.g., user must exist), or situations where it should not be used. With many siblings, this omission is significant.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/idoyudha/mcp-keycloak'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server