get_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the group is retrieved and returns a Group object, but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as required permissions, error handling (e.g., if group not found), or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with no wasted words. The main purpose is front-loaded, followed by structured Args and Returns sections. Every sentence is necessary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with an output schema (Group object), the description is mostly adequate. However, it lacks context on error cases, permissions, or the fact that group_id must exist. Given no annotations, more completeness would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It adds basic explanations: 'group_id: Group ID' and 'realm: Target realm (uses default if not specified)'. The realm's default behavior is clarified, but group_id is tautological. Overall, partial compensation for low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get a specific group by ID.' The verb 'Get' and resource 'group' are clear, and it distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_groups (which lists all groups) and create_group (which creates a group).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_groups or get_group_members. There is no mention of prerequisites, when-not to use, or context-specific hints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.