get_client_secret

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but fails to disclose behavioral traits like whether read-only access is sufficient, what happens if the id is invalid, or if the secret is returned in plaintext. The function name implies read-only, but no explicit behavioral confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using only one sentence plus parameter descriptions. It is front-loaded with the core purpose. However, it could be structured slightly better with explicit sections for when to use.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple parameters and existence of an output schema, the description is minimally complete. However, for a security-sensitive tool like retrieving a client secret, more context about security implications or behavior on missing secrets would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds minimal semantics beyond the schema: it explains that 'id' is the client's database ID and 'realm' uses a default if omitted. With 0% schema description coverage, this is helpful but limited, as the parameter names are already fairly self-explanatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets a client secret, with 'get' as the verb and 'client secret' as the resource. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'regenerate_client_secret' or specify if this retrieves the current or full secret, slightly reducing specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'regenerate_client_secret'. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as required permissions or whether the realm parameter is typically needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.