get_template
Retrieve an email template by its unique ID to view or reuse its content.
Instructions
Retrieve a template by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Retrieve an email template by its unique ID to view or reuse its content.
Retrieve a template by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, openWorldHint=true. Description adds no additional behavioral context beyond this, such as error handling or permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with clear verb and resource, no wasted words. Front-loaded with the action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Description is adequate for a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and rich annotations, but fails to mention return value or error behavior. Leaves agent without full context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% with the parameter 'id' described as 'The resource ID'. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states action (retrieve), resource (template), and required identifier (by ID). Distinguishes from sibling tools like create_template, delete_template, update_template, and list_templates.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_templates for fetching multiple templates. The purpose is implied by the name, but the description lacks contextual usage instructions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/helbertparanhos/resend-email-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server