delete_api_key
Permanently revoke an API key by its unique ID to invalidate access immediately.
Instructions
Permanently revoke an API key by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Permanently revoke an API key by its unique ID to invalidate access immediately.
Permanently revoke an API key by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description adds 'permanently revoke' which reinforces the destructive and irreversible nature beyond the annotations. Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, but the description provides additional behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, front-loaded with verb and resource. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity (one parameter, no output schema, clear annotations), the description is complete enough for an AI agent to understand the tool's purpose.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with description 'The resource ID' for the id parameter. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('revoke') and resource ('API key') with method ('by ID'), clearly distinguishing it from other delete tools like delete_contact or delete_broadcast.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives, such as prerequisites (e.g., the key must exist) or when not to use it (e.g., if key is in use).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/helbertparanhos/resend-email-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server