get_email
Retrieve a sent email by ID to check its current delivery status.
Instructions
Retrieve a single sent email by ID, including its current delivery status.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Retrieve a sent email by ID to check its current delivery status.
Retrieve a single sent email by ID, including its current delivery status.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, and openWorldHint. The description adds value by specifying that the delivery status is included in the response.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the action, resource, and key detail (delivery status) without any wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and full annotation coverage, the description is complete—it specifies the resource type, identifier, and a key aspect of the output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% coverage with a description for the 'id' parameter. The description mentions 'by ID' but adds no further meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves a single sent email by ID and includes delivery status, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_emails or get_contact.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_emails or update_email, but the purpose is clear from context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/helbertparanhos/resend-email-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server