delete_topic
Delete a topic by providing its unique ID to remove it from your Resend email configuration.
Instructions
Delete a topic by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Delete a topic by providing its unique ID to remove it from your Resend email configuration.
Delete a topic by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The resource ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, which describe the behavioral traits. The description simply restates the deletion action without adding context like whether deletion is irreversible or what happens if the topic does not exist. It adds no value beyond what annotations provide.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words, perfectly concise and front-loaded with the essential information. It is appropriately sized for a simple delete operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete tool with one parameter and comprehensive annotations, the description is sufficiently complete. It does not cover return values, but that is acceptable given the lack of an output schema and the typical behavior of delete operations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already describes the 'id' parameter with 'The resource ID', achieving 100% schema description coverage. The description does not add any additional parameter-level details, so it meets the baseline expectation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a topic by ID' clearly states the verb (delete) and the resource (topic), distinguishing it from sibling delete tools that target other resources like contacts or API keys.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides the basic purpose but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as mentioning that it is for deleting topics specifically, not for other resources. Given the straightforward nature, it's adequate but minimal.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/helbertparanhos/resend-email-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server