Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Studio Live

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A production MCP integration that lets AI agents control Roblox Studio to autonomously build, test, and debug Roblox games. Provides 39 tools for explorer control, script management, terrain generation, and autonomous testing.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an MCP runtime that turns Roblox Studio into an AI-native, autonomous, bidirectional development platform, letting AI assistants create and edit scenes, models, animations, scripts, and game systems through 63+ tools. It integrates with the official Roblox Studio MCP and uses 11 specialized providers for modeling, animation, Luau, testing, and diagnostics.
      94
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect, create, edit, debug, and playtest projects inside the Roblox editor via 29 lean tools, with push-based SSE transport, editor-safe script edits, and batched undoable writes.
      35
      1,657 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Roblox Studio by running Luau code, creating and editing instances, reading the scene tree, and managing scripts via an MCP server with a long-polling plugin bridge.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct primary job—observe for structured reads, look for vision QA, run for scripted execution, playtest for session lifecycle, input for synthetic control, events for journal backfill, skills for reusable programs, job for async tracking, cloud for Open Cloud. A couple of near-overlaps remain (observe status/logs versus playtest status and the events journal), but descriptions generally call out when to use each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are lowercase single words in a consistent shorthand style (observe, look, run, playtest, input, events, skills, job, cloud). No casing or separator conventions are mixed, making the naming predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine top-level tools is well-scoped for a Studio automation server; each tool covers a necessary capability, and the broad observe modes are bundled under one read tool rather than fragmented into many MCP tools. Nothing feels redundant at the top level.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full loop: inspect (observe), visually verify (look), mutate and script (run), control playtests (playtest), send input (input), consume events (events), persist reusable programs (skills), manage long jobs (job), and access Open Cloud (cloud). The run tool's S API also provides an escape hatch for anything not explicitly modeled, so there are no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues