Obter Configuração Pessoal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description simply says 'searches', which is consistent but adds no additional behavioral context such as what the response contains or any side effects. Given strong annotations, the description adds minimal value beyond them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the core purpose. It is appropriately sized for a simple retrieval tool with no parameters. However, it could be slightly more informative without being overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, strong annotations, and an output schema (though not detailed here), the description provides a basic understanding. It lacks detail about the output structure or typical values, which might be necessary for correct usage. The use of Portuguese may also reduce clarity for multilingual agents.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so the schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to provide parameter details. The baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description meets this without adding unnecessary information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves financial visibility preferences, which matches the title 'Get Personal Configuration'. It is distinct from sibling tools that deal with accounts, transactions, or profiles. However, it could be more explicit about what specific preferences are included.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'despezzas_profile' or 'despezzas_finance_summary'. No context on prerequisites or typical use cases is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.