Editar Transações em Lote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds context: it can preview (no confirm) or edit (with confirm), and limits to 50 items. It does not fully detail modification behavior (e.g., which fields are overwritten), but it adds meaningful behavioral info beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (one sentence) and front-loaded, but it omits essential details. It earns its place but could be more informative without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (batch update with many fields, preview/write behavior, output schema), the description is incomplete. It does not explain the updates structure, stop_on_error parameter, or what the tool returns. While output schema exists, the description should still provide context for using the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only mentions the 'confirm' parameter, ignoring the complex 'updates' array (with 13 sub-fields) and 'stop_on_error'. This leaves the agent with no guidance on how to structure updates or handle errors.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Pré-visualiza ou edita até 50 transações' (preview or edit up to 50 transactions). It uses a specific verb (preview/edit) and resource (transactions), and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'despezzas_update_transaction' (single edit) by specifying the batch nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description hints at usage by noting that 'confirm=true' is required to write, implying preview without confirm. However, it does not explicitly state when to use batch vs single update tools, nor provide exclusions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.