Excluir Transação

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds that confirm=true is required, which is a behavioral constraint not in annotations. But it does not elaborate on scope behavior or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is minimal (two sentences) and front-loaded, containing no unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose and a critical usage constraint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema (not shown), the description lacks explanation of the scope parameter and what happens when confirm is false. For a delete tool with multiple behavior modes, this is insufficient for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no property descriptions (0% coverage). The description only clarifies the confirm parameter (must be true), but ignores id (required) and scope (enum). This leaves the agent with incomplete understanding of all parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Exclui transação' clearly states the action (delete) and resource (transaction), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, update, search, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly requires confirm=true, guiding the agent to set this parameter. However, it does not provide context on when to use this tool versus alternatives like batch_update_transactions or toggle_transaction_paid.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.