teamleader_get_product

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry behavioral disclosure. The verb 'Get' implies a read-only operation, which is useful, but it does not explicitly state side-effect-free behavior, permissions, or error behavior. Minimal disclosure for a simple get tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no waste. Front-loaded with the core action and resource, and the 'including...' clause adds useful return-field context without bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description only partially characterizes the return value by naming three fields and saying 'details.' It does not cover all possible fields, error conditions, or auth requirements, but for a 1-parameter get tool, the essential call contract is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single id parameter is fully described in the schema ('The product ID'). The description adds no parameter-specific semantics, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('single product'), and differentiates from sibling teamleader_list_products by explicitly scoping to a single product. Mentioning selling price, tax rate, and category adds specificity beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use when a single product ID is available and details are needed, but does not explicitly name alternatives like teamleader_list_products or state when not to use. No exclusions or comparison to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.