Skip to main content
Glama
growing-pai-git

MCP Teamleader Focus

teamleader_create_event

Create a new calendar event in Teamleader Focus, specifying title, time, location, attendees, and linked companies, contacts, or deals.

Instructions

Create a new calendar event in Teamleader Focus

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
linksNoEntities (company/contact/deal) to link the event to
titleYesEvent title
ends_atYesEnd datetime (ISO 8601)
locationNoEvent location
starts_atYesStart datetime (ISO 8601)
descriptionNoEvent description
attendee_idsNoList of attendees
work_type_idNoWork type ID
activity_type_idYesActivity type ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.2

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden, but it only says 'create' and adds no detail about side effects, required fields, validation, or response. The mutation is implied but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no filler, and the action and resource are front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations or output schema and 9 parameters (4 required), the description should provide more behavioral and usage context; it currently leaves the agent to infer everything from the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 9 parameters; the description adds no parameter-level meaning, which is acceptable at baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description names a specific action ('Create') and resource ('calendar event in Teamleader Focus'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling update/cancel/list/get event tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to choose this over teamleader_update_event or teamleader_cancel_event, nor any prerequisites. The only implied context is creating a new event.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools