GoLogin MCP

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. 'Create dev token' implies a write operation but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like authentication requirements, rate limits, side effects, or what the tool returns. It lacks details on whether this is a safe operation or has destructive potential, which is critical for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with just two words, 'Create dev token,' which is front-loaded and wastes no space. It efficiently states the core action and resource without unnecessary elaboration, earning full marks for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a creation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what a dev token is, its purpose, or what the tool returns. This leaves significant gaps for an agent to understand and invoke the tool correctly in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the single parameter 'name' documented as 'Name of the dev token.' The description doesn't add any meaning beyond this, but the high schema coverage justifies a baseline score of 3. No additional context or examples are provided in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create dev token' states the action (create) and resource (dev token), providing a basic purpose. However, it's vague about what a 'dev token' is used for and doesn't distinguish this tool from other creation tools in the sibling list (e.g., post_profile_custom, post_workspaces). It's not tautological but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions. With many sibling tools for creating resources (e.g., profiles, workspaces), the absence of usage guidelines leaves the agent guessing about appropriate scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.