Skip to main content
Glama
gologinapp

GoLogin MCP

Official
by gologinapp

Related Servers

Alternatives to GoLogin MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control Multilogin X anti-detect browser profiles via a streamable HTTP MCP interface. Supports profile management, session handling, and a broad catalog of browser actions such as navigation, clicking, typing, screenshots, and more.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants browse the web through your real Chrome with your cookies, sessions, and fingerprint, avoiding bot detection and CAPTCHAs. Enables web browsing, content extraction, and multi-step workflows via persistent tabs.
      15
      4 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for browser automation with anti-detection. Scout pages, find elements, interact with websites, and monitor network traffic from any AI client that supports the Model Context Protocol.
      21
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 59 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools have clear purposes targeting specific resources like profiles, proxies, folders, and workspaces, but there is notable overlap in operations like multiple delete methods (delete_profile, delete_profile__id__web, delete_workspaces__wid__profiles) and update methods (patch vs. put vs. post for similar actions), which could cause confusion. Descriptions help differentiate, but the sheer number of similar-sounding tools increases ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent with mixed conventions: some use snake_case (e.g., get_profile_v2), others use double underscores for parameters (e.g., delete_profile__id__web), and verbs vary (get, post, patch, put, delete). While there's a general pattern of verb_resource, the lack of a uniform style and the use of underscores and parameters in names make it chaotic and hard to predict.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 59 tools, the count is excessive for the apparent domain of profile and workspace management. This many tools suggests over-fragmentation of operations, making the surface unwieldy and likely overwhelming for agents. A more consolidated set would be more appropriate for efficient use.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set appears to cover the domain comprehensively, including CRUD operations for profiles, proxies, folders, workspaces, and tags, along with advanced features like fingerprint management, sharing, and AI chat. Minor gaps might exist, such as bulk operations for some resources, but overall, the surface supports core workflows without obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive