GoLogin MCP

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. 'Get workspace info' implies a read-only operation, but it doesn't disclose behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, error responses, or whether it returns partial/full workspace data. The description is minimal and lacks necessary context for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with just three words, front-loaded and zero waste. However, this conciseness comes at the cost of completeness, but as a standalone measure, it's perfectly structured without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'workspace info' includes, how to interpret the 'wid' parameter, or what the return value looks like. For a tool with one required parameter and no structured documentation, this minimal description is inadequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It doesn't mention the 'wid' parameter at all, leaving its meaning (e.g., workspace ID), format, or constraints undocumented. With one required parameter and no schema descriptions, the description fails to add any semantic value beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get workspace info' clearly states the verb ('Get') and resource ('workspace info'), but it's vague about what specific information is retrieved. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_workspaces' (plural) by implying single workspace retrieval, but doesn't specify what 'info' includes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the parameter 'wid' suggests retrieving a specific workspace, there's no mention of prerequisites, error conditions, or comparison to sibling tools like 'get_workspaces' (list all workspaces) or 'get_workspaces__wid__profiles' (get profiles within a workspace).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.