get_workspaces__wid__profiles

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states 'Get all profiles' but doesn't clarify if this is a paginated list, what the response format is, whether it requires authentication, or any rate limits. For a tool with 10 parameters and no output schema, this leaves critical behavioral aspects undocumented.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with a single sentence 'Get all profiles in workspace'. It's front-loaded and wastes no words, though this brevity contributes to its inadequacy in other dimensions. Every word earns its place, but more content is needed for completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (10 parameters, no annotations, no output schema, many siblings), the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'profiles' are, how results are returned, or how to use filtering/sorting parameters. For a list operation with rich input options, this leaves too much unsaid for effective agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate but fails to do so. It mentions no parameters, leaving all 10 (including complex ones like 'sortField' with enums, 'offset', 'page', 'search', 'tag') undocumented. The description adds no meaning beyond the bare schema, which is insufficient given the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get all profiles in workspace' clearly states the action (get) and resource (profiles in workspace), but it's vague about scope and doesn't distinguish from sibling tools like 'get_workspaces__wid__profiles_count' or 'get_profile_v2'. It doesn't specify whether this retrieves all profiles at once or with pagination, leaving ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools like 'get_profile_v2', 'get_deleted_profiles_v2', and 'get_workspaces__wid__profiles_count', there's no indication of how this tool differs or when it's preferred, leaving the agent to guess based on naming alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.