Skip to main content
Glama
gmlcjf0326

claude-code-hwp-mcp

by gmlcjf0326

hwp_form_detect

Automatically detects form fields such as empty brackets, checkboxes, and underlines in HWP documents to reveal field locations before filling.

Instructions

문서에서 양식 필드(빈 괄호, 체크박스, 밑줄 등)를 자동 감지합니다. 양식을 채우기 전에 어떤 필드가 있는지 파악할 때 사용하세요.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention side effects, read-only nature, required document state, or other implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each earning its place: first states function, second gives use case. No wasted words, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, but description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., list of field types/positions). Leaves ambiguity about output for a tool with no parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With zero parameters, schema coverage is 100%. Description adds no parameter info, but none is needed. Baseline 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool detects form fields (empty brackets, checkboxes, underlines) in a document, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like hwp_fill_fields or hwp_get_fields by focusing on detection before filling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: 'before filling out the form.' While it doesn't explicitly exclude alternatives, the context of siblings and the use case are clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gmlcjf0326/claude-code-hwp-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server