hwp_break_column
Insert a column break at the current cursor position in an HWP document to start a new column.
Instructions
현재 위치에 다단 나누기를 삽입합니다.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Insert a column break at the current cursor position in an HWP document to start a new column.
현재 위치에 다단 나누기를 삽입합니다.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or what happens to the cursor. It only states the operation without context beyond the action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence that immediately states the purpose. No wasted words; front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimal. It explains the action but lacks context about prerequisites (e.g., must be in a multi-column section) or what happens after insertion. Adequate but could provide more.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the schema coverage is complete. The description adds no parameter information, but with zero parameters, a baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('inserts') and the resource ('column break') with a specific location ('at current position'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like hwp_insert_page_break (page break) and hwp_break_section (section break).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention that it should be used for multi-column layouts or that it differs from page or section breaks. Lacks explicit usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gmlcjf0326/claude-code-hwp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server