hwp_export_docx
Exports the current HWP document to DOCX format. Saves the file to the specified output path.
Instructions
현재 문서를 DOCX(Word) 형식으로 내보냅니다.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| output_path | Yes | DOCX 저장 경로 |
Exports the current HWP document to DOCX format. Saves the file to the specified output path.
현재 문서를 DOCX(Word) 형식으로 내보냅니다.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| output_path | Yes | DOCX 저장 경로 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden. It only states the action without disclosing behavioral traits such as whether the document must be open, if the export overwrites existing files, or what happens on failure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it could benefit from slightly more behavioral context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a mutation tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description lacks important context such as preconditions (document open), success/failure behavior, and side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter (output_path), and the description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline score for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (export) and the resource (current document to DOCX format), distinguishing it from siblings like hwp_export_pdf and hwp_export_html.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., hwp_save_document). The implied usage is for exporting to DOCX, but no context or preconditions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gmlcjf0326/claude-code-hwp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server