Skip to main content
Glama
gmlcjf0326

claude-code-hwp-mcp

by gmlcjf0326

Related Servers

Alternatives to claude-code-hwp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, writing, and managing Korean Hangul Word Processor (HWP/HWPX) files. It allows users to extract content, fill templates, and create new documents directly through AI assistants.
      34
      1,190 npm
      91
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI models to control Hancom Office Hanword (HWP) documents on Windows. It allows for the automated creation, editing, and management of Korean word processor files, including text formatting and table manipulation.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading and writing HWP/HWPX (Korean Hangul word processor) files, enabling document reading, text extraction, table extraction, image extraction, template filling, text replacement, and creation of new documents.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to convert HWP and HWPX documents into Markdown for analysis and processing. It supports document conversion via local file paths or Base64 content across various MCP-compatible clients.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, editing, and creating Hangul Word Processor (.hwpx) files. It enables users to extract text, perform find-and-replace operations, and modify font styles through automated XML patching.
      11 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 134 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes, such as multiple analysis tools (hwp_analyze_document, hwp_smart_analyze, hwp_extract_full_profile) and multiple fill tools (hwp_fill_table_cells, hwp_smart_fill, hwp_auto_fill_from_reference). While descriptions are detailed and often recommend when to use each, the number of similar tools can confuse an agent about which to choose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names start with 'hwp_' and use consistent snake_case with verb_noun or noun_verb patterns (e.g., hwp_get_tables, hwp_fill_fields). There are no mixed conventions like camelCase, though some names are very long and compound (e.g., hwp_korean_business_fill), which is a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 134 tools, the server is far too large for a focused domain like HWP document manipulation. Many tools are specialized variants or combinations of core operations, leading to an excessive surface that would overwhelm agents and increase selection complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers nearly all common HWP operations: open/close/save, text/table/image editing, search/replace, field filling, PDF export, page setup, headers/footers, batch conversion, and even template management. Minor gaps like undo/redo or spell check are absent but not critical for programmatic document creation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues