UpdateView

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the sequence: locks, updates, unlocks, and optionally activates. However, it does not detail what happens on failure, whether creation is truly supported, or permissions required. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description has redundant phrases ('Operation: Update, Create. Subject: View.'). It could be more concise but the core behavioral info is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should explain return values or side effects. It does not mention what the tool returns (e.g., success message, view object). Also missing error scenarios or post-conditions beyond activation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add significant value beyond the schema descriptions; it only restates usage of ddl_source and transport_request. No enhancement to understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates DDL source code of existing CDS/Classic Views. It mentions 'Create' though, which conflicts slightly with the sibling CreateView, but the main purpose is well conveyed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use UpdateView versus alternatives like CreateView or CheckView. It does not state prerequisites (e.g., view must exist) or scenarios where activation is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.