CreateCdsUnitTest

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description must cover behavioral traits. Only states that it creates the test class in initial state, but doesn't disclose side effects, overwrite behavior, permissions needed, or the meaning of 'CDS validation'. Minimal behavioral insight.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with two sentences. No wasted words; purpose is front-loaded. Admirably efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite conciseness, the description omits important context such as return value, impact of CDS validation, and what 'initial state' means. With no output schema, more detail is needed for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented in schema. Description adds no extra parameter information beyond what schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool creates a CDS unit test class with CDS validation, specifying the action and resource. Distinguishes from sibling CreateUnitTest by focusing on CDS-specific functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like CreateUnitTest or other creation tools. Lacks context on prerequisites or scenarios where CDS unit test creation is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.