GetObjectVersions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool is read-only and lists the returned fields, including an opaque content_uri. However, it does not explain any limitations (e.g., pagination, version count limits, authorization requirements). Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden, and these gaps reduce transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the read-only flag and lists key output fields. It is concise and well-structured, though the sentence is somewhat long and could be split for readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description must describe return values. It lists fields (versionId, author, etc.) but omits details like ordering, pagination, or whether all versions are returned. For a list tool, this is adequate but not exhaustive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so each parameter already has a clear description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond noting the content_uri field, which is about output rather than parameters. Thus, the description does not significantly enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists version history of an ABAP object and enumerates returned fields. It distinguishes from sibling tools like GetObjectVersionSource and GetObjectVersionDiff by focusing on listing versions. However, it does not explicitly mention that it works for all object types defined in the schema, but the schema makes that clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description marks the tool as '[read-only]' implying safe use, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this generic version lister versus the specific version tools for each object type (e.g., GetClassVersions). No exclusion criteria or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.