Skip to main content
Glama

separate_vocals

Separate vocals from instrumentals or split audio into individual instrument stems. Downloads the resulting audio files to a specified directory.

Instructions

Separate vocals from instrumentals, or split into individual stems. Downloads to kie/assets/raw/.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeNoseparate_vocal=vocals+instrumental, split_stem=individual instrumentsseparate_vocal
waitNoSet false to submit and return immediately with the task_id (async mode) — then poll with check_task and fetch with download_result.
taskIdYesTask ID of the Suno generation
audioIdYesAudio ID from sunoData
filenameNo
download_dirNoAbsolute directory to save the file(s) into (created if missing). Defaults to the server's kie/assets/raw/. Must be absolute — the MCP server's working directory is not the caller's.
max_wait_secondsNoOverride the blocking-mode polling budget in seconds (default: audio 300). Ignored when wait=false.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses the download location ('kie/assets/raw/'), but does not mention destructiveness, authentication, rate limits, or other behavioral traits. Partial transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, concise and front-loaded with core action. Every word earns its place without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 7 parameters and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It doesn't explain async mode, return values, or how to use results. Incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is high (86%), so baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-specific details beyond the schema, but the schema already documents parameters well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses clear verbs 'Separate' and 'split' with specific resources (vocals, instrumentals, stems). It clearly states the tool's purpose and distinguishes from siblings like audio_isolation or add_vocals.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., audio_isolation). No mention of prerequisites or context. The description lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/elibarnett/kie-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server