Generate song lyrics from a text prompt (max 200 characters) using Suno AI, returning the lyrics as plain text output.
Generate song lyrics from a prompt using Suno AI (max 200 characters). Returns text, no file download.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | Prompt for lyrics generation (max 200 chars) |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v4.7.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose all behavioral traits. Mentions output is text, no file download, and max 200 characters. Adequate but lacks details like rate limits, API key requirements, or whether generation is synchronous.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no fluff. Every word is meaningful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple single-parameter tool without output schema or annotations, the description sufficiently covers purpose, input constraints, and output type. Could mention that prompt should be lyrics-style or something, but not necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with description for prompt. Tool description reinforces the max length constraint but adds no new semantic information beyond what schema provides. Baseline score is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States it generates song lyrics from a prompt using Suno AI, which is specific. Does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like generate_music, but the resource 'lyrics' implies a distinct purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. Does not mention alternatives among the many sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.