Skip to main content
Glama
dolseom

gongsi-mcp

by dolseom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to gongsi-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • dartpoint-mcp by dartpointai

      dartpoint-mcpofficial

      dartpointai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP Server for public disclosure information of Korean companies, powered by the dartpoint.ai API.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • Contract Compass

      sallim-app
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Korean public procurement law, offering LLM-free deterministic rule-based contract-method decisions, statute/regulation search, and live court precedents from law.go.kr.
      MIT

    • dart-mcp

      vertical-mcp
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Korea's DART (Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer) electronic disclosure system, operated by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). Exposes company disclosures, company profiles, and financial statements via the OpenDART public API.
      3
      11 npm
      MIT

    • dart-mcp

      nss133
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes OPEN DART (Korean FSS electronic disclosure) as an MCP server for searching and retrieving original disclosure documents, shareholdings, and financial statements, primarily for legal and internal control review.
      7
      -

    • Korean Law MCP

      pragato-throwaway
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing comprehensive Korean legal data access (laws, precedents, regulations, ordinances) with citation verification, temporal comparison, impact graphs, and legal research workflows.
      10
      4,113 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct compliance task: ex-ante duty determination, special exemption analysis, filing audits, non-filing detection, correction risk, Q&A/manual search, disclosure search, precedent lookup, calendar/business-day calculation, entity resolution, financial lookup, group structure, J004 consistency, and detection-detail retrieval. Overlapping audit tools are clearly delineated by scope, and descriptions explicitly warn when one tool cannot substitute for another.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_disclosure_duty, search_ftc_qna, audit_group_disclosures, get_financials, read_disclosure, etc.). The notable exception is the Korean-named tool with an English alias in parentheses, and a few entries are noun-only (disclosure_calendar, server_info), but overall the convention is readable and mostly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 17 tools, the server is slightly heavy relative to the typical 3–15 sweet spot, but the domain is broad and each tool covers a legitimate, non-redundant slice of Korean corporate disclosure compliance. The count is reasonable for the scope, though an agent must navigate many specialized audit and advisory tools.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full advisory and audit lifecycle: duty determination, exemptions, deadline calculation, calendar planning, filing audits, late-filing detection, non-filing detection, correction-risk assessment, official Q&A/manual lookup, disclosure search/read, precedent lookup, entity and group resolution, financial data, and internal consistency checks. No obvious core operation is missing for a compliance-focused disclosure server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources