Skip to main content
Glama

pine_write8

Writes a single byte (u8 value 0-255) to a specified memory address in emulated RAM. Writes to ROM or read-only regions are ignored.

Instructions

Write a byte (u8) to emulated RAM. Writes to ROM/read-only regions are silently ignored by the emulator.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
addressYesMemory address
valueYes

Implementation Reference

  • src/tools.ts:74-85 (registration)
    Tool schema registration for pine_write8 in the TOOLS array. Defines name, description ('Write a byte (u8) to emulated RAM'), and inputSchema with required 'address' (integer) and 'value' (integer 0-255) parameters.
    {
      name: "pine_write8",
      description: "Write a byte (u8) to emulated RAM. Writes to ROM/read-only regions are silently ignored by the emulator.",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        required: ["address", "value"],
        properties: {
          address: { type: "integer", description: "Memory address" },
          value:   { type: "integer", minimum: 0, maximum: 255 },
        },
      },
    },
  • Tool handler for pine_write8 in the switch statement. Calls pine.write8(addr(), p.value as number) and returns a success message with the hex-formatted written value and target address.
    case "pine_write8": {
      await pine.write8(addr(), p.value as number);
      return ok(`Wrote ${fmtHex(p.value as number)} → ${addrHex(addr())}`);
    }
  • The write8 method on PineClient. Constructs a 5-byte buffer (4-byte LE address + 1-byte value) and sends it via the PINE protocol using opcode Op.Write8 (0x04).
    async write8(addr: number, val: number): Promise<void> {
      const args = Buffer.alloc(5);
      args.writeUInt32LE(addr, 0);
      args.writeUInt8(val, 4);
      await this.call(Op.Write8, args);
    }
  • Opcode constant definition. Op.Write8 is defined as 0x04, used by the write8 helper to identify the write operation to the PINE server.
    export const Op = {
      Read8:        0x00,
      Read16:       0x01,
      Read32:       0x02,
      Read64:       0x03,
      Write8:       0x04,
      Write16:      0x05,
      Write32:      0x06,
      Write64:      0x07,
      Version:      0x08,
      SaveState:    0x09,
      LoadState:    0x0A,
      Title:        0x0B,
      ID:           0x0C,
      UUID:         0x0D,
      GameVersion:  0x0E,
      Status:       0x0F,
    } as const;
    export type Opcode = typeof Op[keyof typeof Op];
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that writes to ROM/read-only regions are silently ignored, which is critical non-obvious behavior. It does not cover error handling or return values, but for such a simple tool, this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the verb and resource, with no redundant words. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, lack of output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the essential purpose, target, and a key behavioral nuance. It is complete for the agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 50% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds meaning by clarifying 'byte (u8)' and 'emulated RAM', which helps the agent understand the context and constraints beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (write), data type (byte, u8), target (emulated RAM), and distinguishes from siblings via size. It also specifies the edge case for ROM/read-only regions, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly tells when to use this tool: to write a single byte. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use, but the naming convention (write8 vs write16/32/64) and the specificity of the description provide sufficient guidance for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dmang-dev/mcp-pine'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server