Skip to main content
Glama
MCPg - Production-grade PostgreSQL MCP Server

MCPg - Production-grade PostgreSQL MCP Server

Get TurboQuant last scan stats

get_turboquant_last_scan_stats
Read-only

Retrieve backend-local stats for the last turboquant scan, including score mode, SIMD kernel, pages scanned/pruned, and raw payload. Returns null when unavailable.

Instructions

Return the backend-local JSON tq_last_scan_stats() reports for the most recent turboquant scan: score_mode, simd_kernel, pages_scanned, pages_pruned, plus the raw payload. Returns null when the extension is absent or no turboquant scan has run on this connection yet.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_turboquant_last_scan_stats"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
databaseNoOptional: a database id from list_databases, to target a configured secondary (read-only) database; omit for the primary. Database names that are not configured ids are rejected.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.8.4
    • changedInput schema / properties / database / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: target a configured secondary (read-only) database by name; omit for the primary. Call list_databases to see the configured ids."New value: +"Optional: a database id from list_databases, to target a configured secondary (read-only) database; omit for the primary. Database names that are not configured ids are rejected."
  2. First observedv0.6.8

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by stating the result is backend-local, tied to the most recent scan on this connection, and returns null when the extension is absent or no scan has run.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences are front-loaded with the return behavior and null conditions, with no redundant or wasted wording. The field list is compact and supports quick scanning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only stats tool with an output schema and full parameter documentation, the description is nearly complete. It explains the main return shape and null behavior, though it does not explicitly position the tool against related TurboQuant diagnostics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the optional database parameter is fully documented in the schema as targeting a configured secondary read-only database. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: return backend-local JSON stats for the most recent TurboQuant scan. It also names the key fields (score_mode, simd_kernel, pages_scanned, pages_pruned), which clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_turboquant_heap_stats or get_turboquant_index_metadata.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this is for inspecting the latest TurboQuant scan and notes the null cases when the extension is absent or no scan has run. However, it gives no explicit when-to-use guidance relative to siblings such as get_turboquant_heap_stats or recommend_turboquant_maintenance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools