list_dashboard_studio_topics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It describes the return value as structured information and lists example contents. The listing nature implies a safe read operation, and no behavioral surprises are omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences achieve clarity: first states purpose and return, second gives usage guidance. No unnecessary words, well front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description provides sufficient context. It could explicitly mention that it is a read-only operation, but this is implied. Overall, it covers the essentials for a simple listing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has no parameters (100% coverage by default), so baseline is 4. The description adds value by detailing what the returned structured information includes (cheatsheet, definition schema, etc.), beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List all available Dashboard Studio documentation topics') and specifies the resource and scope. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_admin_topics' by focusing on Dashboard Studio topics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this to discover what Dashboard Studio documentation is available,' providing clear context for when to use the tool. However, it does not mention alternatives or when not to use it, which is acceptable given the tool's simplicity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.