discover_splunk_docs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully describes the output: an embedded resource with static docs, dynamic patterns, version info, usage patterns. It does not explicitly state read-only behavior, but the content implies no side effects. The description is sufficiently transparent for a search tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat verbose, particularly the bullet list that repeats some ideas from the first paragraph. It could be more concise, but the structure is clear and front-loaded with purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's purpose (discovery), the description adequately covers what to expect: types of docs, URI patterns, version support. No output schema exists, so the description carries the full burden and does so well. Complete enough for an overview tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description adds value by detailing what the tool returns, beyond the empty schema. Baseline 4 is appropriate as description compensates for no parameter info.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool discovers all available Splunk documentation resources, with examples and usage patterns. It specifies it returns a comprehensive guide. While it doesn't explicitly differentiate from siblings like get_splunk_documentation, the nature of 'discovery' versus 'retrieval' is implied.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Perfect for understanding what documentation is available and how to access it,' giving clear context for when to use it. It fails to explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives, but the large set of sibling doc tools implies its role as a starting point.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.