Discover Splunk Docs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states it 'Returns embedded resource with discovery guide' and lists contents, which is useful. However, it doesn't describe side effects (none expected), error handling, or any constraints. It's a simple discovery tool, so this level is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured: a one-line summary, then a bullet list of what is returned. It's concise, no fluff, and front-loaded with the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, a simple discovery guide, it includes the key contents and usage patterns. It could mention that it's a starting point before using specific documentation tools, but the description already implies that. It's sufficiently complete for a zeroparameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters (%100 schema coverage vacuously), so the description doesn't need to explain parameters. It adds value by explaining what the returned guide contains, which is the only relevant semantic information here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Discover all available Splunk documentation resources' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_admin_guide or get_spl_reference by focusing on discovery overview rather than specific content retrieval. The listed content types make its scope unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Perfect for understanding what documentation is available and how to access it through the documentation tools.' This gives clear context for when to use it. It doesn't explicitly mention when NOT to use it, but given the sibling tools (specific reference getters), the usage intent is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.