get_cim_reference

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It describes the return content but does not mention whether the operation is read-only, any authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. The description assumes a read operation without explicit confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two well-structured sentences. The first sentence states the main action and output, the second lists included content. No redundant words or information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (2 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description adequately covers what the tool returns (field specifications, examples, mappings, tagging, guidance). It lacks mention of prerequisites or limitations, but overall is sufficient for a documentation retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description adds a hint to use list_cim_data_models for valid model names, but this is minor and not parameter-specific within the description text. The description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get detailed Splunk CIM data model documentation'. It specifies the resource (CIM data model) and action (get), and distinguishes from siblings like list_cim_data_models (which lists models) and get_spl_reference (SPL reference).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for obtaining CIM documentation but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_cim_data_models or get_spl_reference. No when-not-to-use or alternative mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.