get_splunk_cheat_sheet

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description carries full burden. Clearly states it returns an embedded resource with markdown content and lists included categories. No mention of side effects, auth, or rate limits, but the tool appears read-only and safe.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two well-structured sentences in first paragraph stating purpose, followed by bullet-style list of content categories. Front-loaded and no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters and no output schema, the description fully explains what the tool returns, including specific content categories, making it complete for an agent to understand its value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters; baseline score 4. Description adds value by detailing the content categories beyond what the empty schema conveys.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool returns a comprehensive Splunk SPL cheat sheet as an embedded resource with markdown content, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_spl_reference or get_admin_guide.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'perfect for quick reference during SPL query development and troubleshooting', inferring when to use. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives, but context from sibling tools is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.