Skip to main content
Glama
cyanheads

pubmed-mcp-server

by cyanheads

Pubmed Format Citations

pubmed_format_citations
Read-only

Formats citations for PubMed articles in APA, MLA, BibTeX, RIS, or Vancouver styles. Provide one or more PMIDs to retrieve citations in your preferred format.

Instructions

Get formatted citations for PubMed articles in one or more formats (apa, mla, bibtex, ris, vancouver). Pass a single format as a string or multiple as an array.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pmidsYesPubMed IDs to cite
formatNoCitation format(s) to generate — single style as a string or multiple as an array. Allowed values: apa, mla, bibtex, ris, vancouver.apa

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noticeNoOptional guidance when no citations were produced — points to discovery tools. Absent when at least one citation was produced.
citationsYesCitations per article
totalFormattedYesNumber of PMIDs successfully formatted
totalSubmittedYesNumber of PMIDs submitted for citation formatting
unavailablePmidsNoRequested PMIDs that did not return article metadata
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true. Description adds no additional behavioral context such as error handling or output structure, which is partly covered by output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff, front-loaded with action. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

All parameters are well-documented in schema, output schema exists, and sibling tools provide context. No missing information for a formatting tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and description adds minimal clarification about format passing style. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'get' and the resource 'formatted citations for PubMed articles' with explicit supported formats. It differentiates from sibling tools by focusing on citation formatting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on passing a single format as a string or multiple as an array. Lacks explicit comparison to alternatives but sibling list makes distinct purpose clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cyanheads/pubmed-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server