set_clip_anchor_point

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must bear the burden. It doesn't disclose whether this is a read or write operation, potential side effects, or required setup. 'Expanded operation' is ambiguous and could imply complex behavior, but details are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but it's under-specified rather than concise. The phrase 'expanded operation' is filler and adds no value. It could be improved with actionable details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the large number of sibling tools and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't clarify what 'anchor point' refers to (e.g., motion anchor point) or how it affects the clip. Adequate for a simple setter, but lacking context in a complex Premiere Pro environment.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema shows 0 parameters, so there is nothing to describe. The description adds no parameter info because none exist. Given schema description coverage is 100% (vacuously), a baseline of 4 is suggested for 0 params, but the description still lacks clarity about how the anchor point is set (implicitly via selection?). I'll give 3 as no value added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Premiere Pro expanded operation: set clip anchor point.' is vague - it does not specify what the tool does beyond setting an anchor point, nor does it distinguish from siblings like set_clip_scale, set_clip_rotation, etc. It uses 'expanded operation' without explaining what that means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites like having a clip selected or a sequence active. The name suggests a clip modification, but no context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.