replace_clip_media

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals nothing beyond what the name implies, such as side effects, destructive potential, or what 'expanded' means in practice. This is a significant transparency gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler words, making it concise. However, it is so terse that it omits necessary context, clinging to the minimal 'expanded operation' phrase without explanation. It is appropriately short but lacks substance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations, output schema, and rich parameter info, the description should offer more behavioral and usage context. It does not clarify what 'expanded' entails, prerequisites, side effects, or expected outcomes, leaving it inadequate for an agent to confidently select and invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema defines zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to elaborate on. Per the baseline for zero parameters, the description does not need to compensate for missing parameter details, and the schema coverage is complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action 'replace clip media' but the qualifier 'expanded operation' is vague and fails to distinguish this tool from the sibling 'replace_clip' or 'relink_media'. The verb is clear but the scope and meaning of 'expanded' are undefined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternative tools such as 'replace_clip' or 'relink_media'. The description provides no context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.