select_clips_by_name

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description does not disclose side effects such as whether the selection replaces or augments the current selection, or if it affects the playhead or timeline state. The tool's behavior is opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief, consisting of a single sentence. While it is not wordy, it omits essential details, so it is not well-structured or sufficiently informative for a tool of this nature.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks context about the environment (Premiere Pro), the selection scope (which clips), and any constraints or side effects. Compared to sibling tools that have more descriptive names, this one provides minimal operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema shows an empty object with arbitrary properties, but no parameters are described. There is no explanation of expected inputs like a clip name or regex pattern, making it impossible to know how to invoke the tool correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool selects clips by name, which is a clear action and resource. However, the phrase 'expanded operation' is ambiguous and does not clarify the specific context (e.g., timeline vs. project panel) or how selection is applied.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other selection tools like select_clips_by_color or select_all_clips. The description lacks any mention of prerequisites, typical use cases, or scenarios where this tool is preferable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.