remove_effect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There is no annotation or description of side effects, reversibility, or permission requirements. The tool's behavior is entirely opaque; it does not even confirm whether it is destructive or how it handles missing effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and to the point, but it lacks any substantive content. It is well-structured as a single sentence but adds no value beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the surrounding toolset, this description is grossly incomplete. It does not mention the target (clip, sequence, etc.), the effect type, or any options, making it impossible to use correctly without external knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema is essentially empty (no defined properties), and the description does not explain any parameters or optional arguments. It fails to clarify what inputs the tool accepts or expects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description merely restates the tool name ('remove effect') without specifying what effect, from which element, or how it differs from sibling tools like 'remove_effect_by_name' or 'remove_all_effects'. It provides no additional clarity beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention typical scenarios, prerequisites, or any conditions that would make this the preferred choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.