Skip to main content
Glama
chrischall

freshbooks-mcp

by chrischall

freshbooks_list_invoices

Read-only

List invoices for your authenticated FreshBooks account with pagination and custom filter parameters. Returns invoice items with page and total counts.

Instructions

List invoices for the authenticated FreshBooks account. Supports pagination and raw FreshBooks filter params. Returns items plus page/pages/total.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number
searchNoRaw FreshBooks filter params passed through verbatim, e.g. {"search[customerid]": 123} or {"include[]": "lines"}. Field names are not validated.
per_pageNoResults per page (max 100)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.7.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.3.1
    • removedInput schema / properties / search / additionalProperties / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "boolean"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / search / additionalProperties / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "number",
      +  "boolean"
      +]
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful behavior: pagination support, verbatim pass-through of raw FreshBooks filters, and the response envelope (items plus page/pages/total), which is valuable given there is no output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the core action, then capability, then return shape. Every sentence carries distinct information with no repetition or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with no output schema, the description compensates by describing the return envelope (items plus page/pages/total) and the pagination/filter model. It stops short of noting default page size or total-vs-page relationship, but an agent has enough to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents page, per_page and the passthrough search object in detail. The description restates the same capabilities (pagination, raw filters) without adding syntax or format detail beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('List invoices') and scopes it to the authenticated account, which distinguishes it from the singular freshbooks_get_invoice. It does not explicitly name that sibling or any other alternative, so an agent must infer the list-vs-single distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the name and the mention of pagination/filtering, but the description never states when to reach for this tool over freshbooks_get_invoice or freshbooks_list_clients, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.