Skip to main content
Glama

search_tasks

Search and filter tasks using Elasticsearch, with parameters for workspace, board, status, assignees, tags, priority, completion, dates, and pagination.

Instructions

Search tasks (Elasticsearch-backed)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNo1-based page number for paginated list endpoints.
tagsNoNested filter on tags (e.g. `tags:42`).
SpaceNoOptional sub-space ID for further scoping inside the workspace.
boardNo
expandNoComma-separated list of fields to expand inline on the response (FlexFields style, e.g. `assignees,tags,time_tracking`).
searchNo
statusNo
completeNo
due_dateNo
orderingNo
priorityNo
assigneesNoNested filter on assignees (e.g. `assignees:123`).
page_sizeNoPage size for paginated list endpoints.
task_typeNo
start_dateNo
OrganizationNoWorkspace (organization) ID the request is scoped to.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only mentions 'Elasticsearch-backed'. This gives minimal behavioral context; it does not disclose read-only nature, rate limits, or response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but lacks necessary details. It is not concise in a helpful way; it is under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 16 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to provide enough context for correct tool usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (44%), and the description adds no parameter information beyond the schema. The description fails to compensate for the gap, leaving many parameters undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it searches tasks and mentions Elasticsearch-backed, implying full-text search. It distinguishes from 'list_tasks' and 'search_recent_tasks' but does not explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like 'list_tasks' or 'search_recent_tasks'. No context on prerequisites or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/celeryhq/simplified-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server