syndicate_trending

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the sorting logic, time window, and minimum confirms, which is adequate. However, it does not mention rate limits, whether it is a read-only operation, or if results are computed dynamically vs cached.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each adding unique value: purpose + metric, usage guidance, and a threshold condition. No redundant information, front-loaded with core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description explains what is shown but does not specify the fields returned or ordering details beyond the metric. The limit parameter is covered, but for a trending list, more details on output format would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (limit) with a schema description that covers default and max. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, but the main text provides context about the tool's behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Show', the resource 'trending lessons', and the specific metric 'confirmation velocity' with a time window, effectively distinguishing it from siblings like syndicate and syndicate_search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit usage guidance is provided: 'Use this at the start of a session or weekly review to see what the community is actively validating.' It also mentions a condition (at least 2 confirms), but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.