unwatch_topic

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the mutation is known. The description adds value beyond that by disclosing the exact-match requirement and the explicit not-found error behavior, which are behavioral details not present in the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, each carrying unique value: the main action, the matching constraint, and the error/fallback behavior. Ends with a pointed pointer to list_watches, with zero filler words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-param delete tool, the description covers the core behavior, the error path, and the recommended pre-use step. The lack of an output schema is partially offset by the not-found error description; the only minor gap is the success return shape, which is not critical given the low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the topic parameter well. The description reinforces the exact-match concept and the relationship to watch_topic, but adds no new parameter syntax, formatting, or constraint beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the verb 'Delete' with a precise resource ('saved topic watch') and the exact matching mechanism. This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like list_watches (inspect) and watch_topic (create), so an agent knows which tool to pick.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete guidance: 'Use list_watches to inspect saved watches before deleting,' which is a practical pre-step and names the relevant sibling. It stresses the exact-match prerequisite but doesn't explicitly cover when-not-to-use scenarios relative to other siblings like check_alerts, so it stops at clear context with no exclusion list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.