reindex

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not explain side effects like potential downtime or performance impact during rebuilding. With destructiveHint=false, it fails to clarify that clearing the existing index (if clear_existing=true) is a destructive action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It conveys the essential purpose without extraneous details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. However, it lacks situational context (e.g., when reindexing is needed) and does not mention prerequisites like having downloaded papers.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already fully documents the 'clear_existing' parameter with a description, achieving 100% coverage. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'rebuild' and the specific resource 'local semantic index for downloaded papers', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'download_paper' or 'semantic_search'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to reindex the index, such as after downloading new papers or when search results are stale. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.